Thursday, January 21, 2010

Supreme Court overturns ban on direct corporate spending on elections

So if I have a $100 to spend on a politician's campaign, but a corporation wants to spend $100,000.00 on the opposite campaign - does my $100 really mean anything? I don't understand? Why would the Supreme Court of the United States want to overturn this law? Smells like more reasons why you and you opinions don't matter.

2 comments:

Mateo Berumindale said...

What about the Corporation that agrees with you? They get to spend their money too.

No matter the original intentions of campaign finance reform, we still need to deal with that piece of shit 1st Amendment.

Wow. I can say that?

Team America! Fuck Ya.

AaronX said...

I don't even understand how this falls under the first amendment? It's total hogwash.